lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: time() glitch on 2.4.18: solved
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 01:57:16PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> No! You will break many machines. You cannot use out_p() when
> writing the latch it __must__ be out(). the "_p" puts a write
> to another port between the two writes. That will screw up
> the internal state-machine of most PITs including AMD-SC520.

You make an interesting point. Have you checked if an inb_p() on this hardware
could unlock the latch when reading the first byte ? It may also be one cause
of time jumps if the counter is just about to wrap when it's being read, and
gets unlocked by an out to port 0x80 (the "_p").

> count = inb_p(0x40); /* read the latched count */
> count |= inb(0x40) << 8;

Or perhaps it will be time to change port 0x80 to something else, that no
chipset will use. I've seen 0xED in a bios somewhere, but I don't remember
where.

Cheers,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.063 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site