[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly
    On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 01:21, Robert Love wrote:
    > I agree 100% we mark too much as inline - but at the same time, some
    > larger functions are inline simply because they were originally part of
    > another function and pulled out for cleanliness. They are only used
    > once... in other words, in some cases I hope the kernel developers know
    > what they are doing when they mark stuff inline.

    gcc actually appears to know about that case for static functions.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.019 / U:7.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site