[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 01:21, Robert Love wrote:
> I agree 100% we mark too much as inline - but at the same time, some
> larger functions are inline simply because they were originally part of
> another function and pulled out for cleanliness. They are only used
> once... in other words, in some cases I hope the kernel developers know
> what they are doing when they mark stuff inline.

gcc actually appears to know about that case for static functions.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean