Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:45:12 -0200 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: uml-patch-2.5.49-1 |
| |
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
> That's just one example... the idea is that you want maximal separation > between the guest OS's apps and the host OS. Sort of like "VM" on IBM's > series of mainframe architecures. [snip]
That's a nice idea, but in practice you also want efficient execution of processes in the virtual machines and a virtual host implementation that's flexible and easy to maintain.
As usual, you can't have everything so you'll have to make choices here and there. The end result will be a useful compromise between all the different ideas...
Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |