lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: uml-patch-2.5.49-1
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Patrick Finnegan wrote:

> That's just one example... the idea is that you want maximal separation
> between the guest OS's apps and the host OS. Sort of like "VM" on IBM's
> series of mainframe architecures. [snip]

That's a nice idea, but in practice you also want efficient
execution of processes in the virtual machines and a virtual
host implementation that's flexible and easy to maintain.

As usual, you can't have everything so you'll have to make
choices here and there. The end result will be a useful
compromise between all the different ideas...

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.034 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site