Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2/4 Module Parameter Support | Date | Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:57:00 +1100 |
| |
In message <3DD9DBFF.5000009@pobox.com> you write: > Question for the crowd: > > Should linux/module.h include moduleparam.h, since drivers are used to > include'ing module.h to get all their MODULE_xxx desires fulfilled?
Hmm, they already need linux/init.h for module_init() and module_exit(). Of course the backwards compat MODULE_PARM must not require an extra include (and it doesn't, does it?).
I guess this leads to the bigger "what are the rules for new header files?" question, which I'm not prepared to try to answer.
Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |