lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromCon Kolivas <>
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] rmap15, rmap14c and rc1aa1 with contest
DateMon, 25 Nov 2002 00:32:02 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for this interesting comparison

>noload:
>Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       84.6    95      0       0       1.00
>2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      84.2    96      0       0       1.00
>2.4.20-rc1aa1 [2]       41.0    49      0       0       inf

Clearly my braindead parser failed here. The time of aa1 should probably be 82 
seconds (41.0 x 2) Can you check the full log of 2.4.20-rc1aa1.log ? It has 
raw results.

>process_load:
>Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       140.8   55      133     45      1.66
>2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      139.4   56      126     45      1.65
>2.4.20-rc1aa1 [2]       133.9   14      211     84      inf

If the error continued here (2 runs of process_load) then the time of aa1 
should be 133.9 x 2. Can you check the full log of 2.4.20-rc1aa1.log here 
too?

>io_load:
>Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       164.8   51      33      19      1.95
>2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      160.1   53      33      21      1.90
>2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       166.2   49      44      23      inf
>
>read_load:
>Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       0.0     0       0       7       0.00
>2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      121.0   72      20      7       1.44
>2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       111.2   79      34      14      inf
>
>rmap15 OOM'd the cc1 process twice and fscked this run up.
>
>list_load:
>Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       99.2    84      0       7       1.17
>2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      100.7   83      0       7       1.20
>2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       96.7    85      0       8       inf
>
>mem_load:
>Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       111.2   80      96      8       1.31
>2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      106.1   82      96      9       1.26
>2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       126.3   66      77      3       inf

With only one run these numbers appear not to be greatly statistically 
significant, except for the mem_load results.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE94NTSF6dfvkL3i1gRAkwXAJ9YJmnxvxdiYyESNYLeQa9sbwR+2wCcCZal
bFKWReK3EP8oayP/GwiIK7c=
=gYaS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2008