[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)
    * Patrick Finnegan ( wrote:
    > On 2 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
    > > > Oh please....
    > > > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the
    > > > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like
    > > > the library?
    > >
    > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt.
    > And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi vs
    > emacs discussion.
    > Personally, it makes no difference to me which library is used. I'm
    > doubtful I'll use anything other than menuconfig unless it makes my life a
    > *whole* lot easier. I'd say 'choose one and get on with it.'

    Exactly my point. I just don't see the point in spending the neuron
    hours on both.

    But you guys who are worried about space and dependencies always can:
    1) use menuconfig
    2) Write one in Tcl/Tk which is nice and small and portable and has
    few dependencies......oh we've been there.

    ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------
    / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
    \ gro.gilbert @ | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex /
    \ _________________________|_____ |_______/
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.024 / U:1.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site