lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BK PATCHES] initramfs merge, part 1 of N


On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Probably not to kinit, but to early userspace, yes. There is no real
> reason to put everything into kinit, and a lot of these things we have
> already written up as part of the klibc bundle.

s/probably/definitely/

There is a lot of reasons for _not_ putting everything into one binary -
if nothing else, it allows to deal with situations like
/* do a lot of things that are OK for userland */
/* do ugly magic */
/* do a lot of things that are OK for userland */
without exporting ugly crap.

It's much better to have several userland helpers called from init sequence
to do sane stuff in userland and leave remaining crap where it is, than
to add user-visible interfaces that don't make sense.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.061 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site