Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:40:04 +1100 | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.48-mm1 with contest |
| |
Quoting Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>:
> On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 16:28, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > xtar_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > 2.5.48 [5] 184.4 41 2 6 2.52 > > 2.5.48-mm1 [5] 210.7 35 2 6 2.88 > > > > read_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > 2.5.48 [5] 102.9 74 6 4 1.41 > > 2.5.48-mm1 [5] 256.7 29 11 2 3.51* > > What changed, Andrew? > > Wall time is up but CPU is down... spending more time on I/O? > > Con, mind refreshing me on what the LCPU% and Ratio columns mean?
LCPU% is the cpu% as reported by 'time load' - It will overestimate slightly. Ratio is the simply kernel compile time over reference (in this case 2.4.18 with no load).
Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |