Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:40:41 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree |
| |
> in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've > set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at > bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched > (Web view: http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/) > This used to contain my node affine NUMA scheduler, I'll add extra > trees when the additional patches for that are tested on top of our > NUMA scheduler. > > Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the > core and the initial load balancer separate? > > The tree is currently in sync with bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and > I'll try to keep so.
BTW, can you keep producing normal patches too, when you do an update? I don't use bitkeeper ...
Thanks,
Martin.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |