lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: NUMA scheduler BK tree
    > in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've
    > set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at
    > bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched
    > (Web view: http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/)
    > This used to contain my node affine NUMA scheduler, I'll add extra
    > trees when the additional patches for that are tested on top of our
    > NUMA scheduler.
    >
    > Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the
    > core and the initial load balancer separate?
    >
    > The tree is currently in sync with bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and
    > I'll try to keep so.

    BTW, can you keep producing normal patches too, when you do an update?
    I don't use bitkeeper ...

    Thanks,

    Martin.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:4.347 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site