[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Run timers as softirqs, not tasklets
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:20:11PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Seems to me that the timer code is attempting to replicate the softirq
> characteristics at the tasklet level, which is a little pointless. This
> patch converts timers to be a first-class softirq citizen.
> Ingo, was there a reason you didn't do it this way to begin with?

I wrote that part of smptimers to run the per-CPU lists from per-CPU
tasklets while porting Ingo's code to 2.5 and Ingo just included it.
At that time, it didn't seem necessary to use up a softirq vector
when it could be easily done using tasklets.

However it should work fine with softirqs too.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.067 / U:0.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site