[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.5.47bk2 + current modutils == broken hotplug
    In message <> you write:
    > Hotplugging may well change more in 2.5, but I'd rather have it do
    > so on a more flexible schedule than "quick, before 2.5.48 ships"! :)

    Hey, I want to get humpty dumpty back together ASAP, too. But I'm in
    Spain without an x86 box (my test box is available though a modem to
    IBM's intranet, two ssh's away), so it's a little difficult for me,
    too. And I'm still catching up on mail.

    > Is it true that the infrastructure newly in place can easily be
    > made to provide (from user-space) the policy of "driver remains
    > loaded until the devices it's bound to are all unplugged"?

    That should always be true, unless I'm missing something. What kind
    of devices?

    > That'd be a user-friendly policy, but we'd still need to handle
    > today's developer-oriented "sysadmin can always remove module"
    > policy. (Me, I'd run with the "user friendly" policy except
    > when hacking a driver. Then I'd debug/rmmod/update/modprobe.)

    rmmod -f is about as unfriendly as you can get, really 8)

    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:1.327 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site