[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [parisc-linux] Untested port of parisc_device to generic device interface
    On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:46:58PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
    > Greg KH <> writes:
    > > What is the real reason for needing this, pci_alloc_consistent()? We
    > > have talked about renaming that to dev_alloc_consistent() in the past,
    > > which I think will work for you, right?
    > This this would end up [or have the ability to] invoking a bus-specific
    > routine at some point, right? [so that a truly PCI-specific definition
    > could be still be had]

    If that was needed, yes, we should not break that functionality.

    Are there any existing archs that need more than just dma_mask moved to
    struct device out of pci_dev? Hm, ppc might need a bit more...


    greg k-h
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.019 / U:29.720 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site