Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:08:46 -0800 | From | Bruce Ferrell <> | Subject | Re: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy |
| |
While the posting wasn't directly linked to kernel development, I did find the analysis to be thought provoking. I think calling it spam MIGHT be too strong.
john slee wrote: > On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:18:24PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > >>As part of the "Better SCM" site (that is still under construction), I >>wrote a few essays about BitKeeper: > > > please do not spam the list with this crap > > j. >
[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature] | |