lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy
While the posting wasn't directly linked to kernel development, I did 
find the analysis to be thought provoking. I think calling it spam
MIGHT be too strong.

john slee wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:18:24PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
>>As part of the "Better SCM" site (that is still under construction), I
>>wrote a few essays about BitKeeper:
>
>
> please do not spam the list with this crap
>
> j.
>

[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.028 / U:1.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site