Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Nov 2002 23:55:35 -0500 | From | Mark Mielke <> | Subject | Re: Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) |
| |
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:27:41PM -0800, John Gardiner Myers wrote: > There's also the oddity that I noticed this week: pipes don't report > POLLOUT readiness through the classic poll interface until the pipe's > buffer is completely empty. Changing this to report POLLOUT readiness > when the pipe's buffer is not full apparently causes NIS to break.
These seems deficient. Does this mean that pipes managed via poll() are not able to maximum throughput?
mark
-- mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________ . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |