lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.8


    Roman Zippel wrote:

    >>Well, my basic preference is
    >>
    >>* something other than Config.new (the original name in your config system)
    >>* something other than Config.in
    >>
    >>I think it is a mistake to name a totally different format the same name
    >>as an older format... even "config.in" would be better than "Config.in"...
    >>
    >>
    >
    >My first plan was to use Config.in, but I can't overwrite the old files
    >yet, so I named it Config.new. Personally I only prefer that it starts
    >with a capital letter (like Makefile, Readme), so it's at the top of a
    >dir listing, but otherwise I don't care much about the name.
    >

    Simple and boring but how about "Config2.in" or "Config-2.in" ???

    Regards,
    Brendan Simon.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.021 / U:125.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site