[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:

    > Maybe it is doing for purpose of slowing down subversion/CVS/arch
    > development. Thats about as bad.

    You sound about as pissed off as you do in a random thread about
    somebody who violates the GPL, only now you're on the other side
    of the fence.

    If you don't like the new bitkeeper license, don't use bitkeeper.

    If you feel _really_ strongly about it, help the subversion people
    to build something as good as, or better than, bitkeeper so you
    can convince kernel hackers to switch.


    Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
    Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:""></a>

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.018 / U:12.508 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site