lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: New BK License Problem?
    On 7 Oct 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

    > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 20:06, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
    > > If BK migrates to proprietary format everybody will notice and you'll still
    > > have the opportunity to rescue a not too old repository and carry on with
    > > life using whatever alternate SCM you wish. If such a thing happened Lary
    > > would be publicly and universally discredited and he's not looking for that
    > > I'm sure.
    >
    > If BK migrates to a proprietary format the code won't be in the
    > preferred form of the work for making modifications.

    Because you think BK will still have the backing of all kernel developers
    using it today if that happens? Some might find BK's nice to use despite its
    license, but locking the main kernel repository into a proprietary format is
    totally unacceptable for most if not all of them I'm sure. That's why Larry
    won't go that route or he'll lose the Linux kernel user base right away.


    Nicolas

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.031 / U:29.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site