[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))
On Monday 07 October 2002 20:58, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Go into ext2_new_inode, replace the call to find_group_dir with
> > find_group_other. Then untar a kernel tree, unmount the fs,
> > remount it and see how long it takes to do a
> >
> > `find . -type f xargs cat > /dev/null'
> >
> > on that tree. If your disk is like my disk, you will achieve
> > full disk bandwidth.
> Pardon my ignorance, but what's the difference between find_group_dir
> and find_group_other, and why aren't we using find_group_other already
> if its so much faster?

These are the heuristics that determine where in the volume directory
inodes are allocated:

Ext2 likes to spread directory inodes around the volume so that there is
room to keep the associated file blocks nearby. This interacts rather
poorly with readahead.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.208 / U:5.432 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site