lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New BK License Problem?
> Could you clarify exactly why it is a problem that someone both uses
> BitKeeper and works on potentially-competing SCM systems, if the two
> activities are unrelated?
...
> Is it that you think that direct
> experience with BK will give someone insight into its pluses and minuses
> beyond what they could get from just reading about it, thereby
> indirectly making their competing product better?

That's it. BK is fairly subtle, it takes a while to wrap your brain around
it. The way it works is hard to see from the outside and it is hard to see
the value. So blind copying is more likely to copy the wrong parts. On
the other hand, if I'm using BK every day and then working on a clone, it's
very easy to "do some unrelated work" to see how BK works.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.038 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site