[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] HZ as a config option
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 23:53, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>On large systems (like NUMA-Q, Intel Profusion, etc...), latency and
>>user responsiveness become much less important. The extra scheduling
>>overhead caused by higher HZ is bad.
>>This is x86-only right now. Is there any wider desire to tune this at
>>config time? Do any architecutures have strict rules as to what this
>>can be set to?
> You can't set this arbitarily, the NTP PLL's will only lock for certain
> value ranges.

Where can I find these ranges? include/linux/timex.h only errors if
the number is out of the 12-1535 range.

Dave Hansen

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.064 / U:3.324 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site