[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BK MetaData License Problem?

    On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > If this is a concern, it actually appears that BK has the capability to
    > "enforce" a license, in that I coul dmake BK aware of the GPL and that
    > would cause BK to pop up a window saying "Do you agree to this license"
    > before the first check-in by a person (the same way it asked you whether
    > you wanted to allow openlogging).

    sounds interesting - is it difficult to enabled it, just to see how much
    impact it has on daily work?

    > Do people feel that would be a good idea? I actually dismissed it when
    > Larry talked about it, because I felt people might take it as another
    > "too much BK in your face", even though the license would be the _Linux_
    > license, not the BK one.

    well, if it can be made a one-time thing, ie. something like: 'from now on
    if you commit in the repository and distribute the changes then all those
    changes and related BK metadata are licensed under the GPL', that would be
    less intrusive i guess?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.018 / U:70.512 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site