lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?
FromAlan Cox <>
Date05 Oct 2002 14:20:43 +0100
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 05:35, Andi Kleen wrote:
>  		 */
> diff -urN linux-2.4.18.tmp/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h linux-2.4.18.SuSE/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h
> --- linux-2.4.18.tmp/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h	Sat May  4 11:37:28 2002
> +++ linux-2.4.18.SuSE/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h	Sat May  4 11:37:56 2002
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
>  #define TIOCGSID	0x5429  /* Return the session ID of FD */
>  #define TIOCGPTN	_IOR('T',0x30, unsigned int) /* Get Pty Number (of pty-mux device) */
>  #define TIOCSPTLCK	_IOW('T',0x31, int)  /* Lock/unlock Pty */
> +#define TIOCGDEV	_IOR('T',0x32, unsigned int) /* Get real dev no below /dev/console */
> 

Shouldn't these values be reserved in 2.5 before anything goes into 2.4
for this - the values finally used might be different

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008