lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: export of sys_call_table
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:32:21PM -0600, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:

> You do know that there *is* open source code which is not
> contained in the Linux kernel ;)

I think the fact that downloading the kernel source, applying a patch,
fixing the conflicts, and rebooting, can be a significant PITA for
admin/developers has completely passed them by.

> development kernels only), because the symbol is no longer
> exported and no registration procedure was provided for
> registering otherwise non-implemented system calls (in
> particular the UNIX98 and iBCS/ABI standard putmsg/getmsg
> calls).

Look, why don't you submit the module-loading patch for LiS already ?

Btw, anybody know what the BKL is actually protecting against in
sys_nfsservctl ?

> And what about AFS? I see that it uses a sys_ni_syscall slot as
> well...

I thought it got fixed last time round.

regards
john

--
"Me and my friends are so smart, we invented this new kind of art:
Post-modernist throwing darts"
- the Moldy Peaches
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.977 / U:3.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site