[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: export of sys_call_table
    On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 01:06, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
    > Alan,
    > Would it be possible to put a secondary call table behind
    > the call gate wrappered in sys_ni_syscall that a module
    > could register against.
    Why ?
    Adding "unknown" syscalls is I doubt EVER a good idea.
    LiS has *known* and *official* syscalls, they can easily live with a
    stub like nfsd uses.... few lines of code and it's safe.

    Arjan van de Ven
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.018 / U:1.232 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site