[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: export of sys_call_table
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 01:06, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> Alan,
> Would it be possible to put a secondary call table behind
> the call gate wrappered in sys_ni_syscall that a module
> could register against.
Why ?
Adding "unknown" syscalls is I doubt EVER a good idea.
LiS has *known* and *official* syscalls, they can easily live with a
stub like nfsd uses.... few lines of code and it's safe.

Arjan van de Ven
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.112 / U:2.384 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site