Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: export of sys_call_table | | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | | Date | 04 Oct 2002 11:10:12 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 01:06, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Alan, > > Would it be possible to put a secondary call table behind > the call gate wrappered in sys_ni_syscall that a module > could register against. Why ? Adding "unknown" syscalls is I doubt EVER a good idea. LiS has *known* and *official* syscalls, they can easily live with a stub like nfsd uses.... few lines of code and it's safe. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |