lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CONFIG_TINY
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:33:21PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Am Don, 2002-10-31 um 09.24 schrieb Rasmus Andersen:
>
> > I tried -Os once, and it didn't boot for me. So I dumped it.
> > However, reading a mail from Zwane <somethingorother> about
> > booting 2.5.x on a 4MB system I got the impression that he
> > used Os, so I might give it another shot. Dropping down to
> > i386 support, perhaps.
>
> If you meant removing special support for faster processors this might
> be a gain, if it was something along the lines of "-mcpu=i386
> -mtune=i386" this would be pretty sure a loss resulting in bigger code.

I was just wondering aloud if my boot problem would go away if
I did -Os and -mcpu=386. Just a wonder, though.

Regards,
Rasmus
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.184 / U:1.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site