Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:43:48 +0100 | From | Rasmus Andersen <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_TINY |
| |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 05:52:59PM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > Matt Porter <porter@cox.net> wrote: > >Thank you. This is exactly why in the last CONFIG_TINY thread I made > >it clear that a one-size-fits-all option is not all that helpful for > >serious embedded systems designers. > > > >Collecting these parameters in a single tweaks.h file and perhaps using > >things like CONFIG_TINY, CONFIG_DESKTOP, CONFIG_FOO as profile selectors > > In an ideal world there would be several options invidually > selectable.
But there is? Please look at 2.5.44-config. Or did I misunderstand you. Anyways, this work is far from the point where how this is selected is a major concern.
Regards, Rasmus [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |