[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 current bk fix setting scsi queue depths
    On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:17:52AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
    > said:
    > > This patch fixes a problem with the current linus bk tree setting scsi
    > > queue depths to 1. Please apply.
    > This patch causes the depth specification to be retained when we release
    > commandblocks. Since releasing command blocks is supposed only to be done
    > when we give up the device (and therefore, is supposed to clear everything),
    > your fix looks like it's merely masking a problem, not fixing it.
    > Is the real problem that this controller is getting a release command blocks
    > and then a reallocate of them after slave_attach is called? If so, that's
    > probably what needs to be fixed.
    > James

    Yes, the problem is that in scsi_register_host() if there are no upper
    level drivers - the standard case if building no modules - we call
    scsi_release_commandblocks even though we are NOT getting rid of
    the scsi_device. So, with current code, new_queue_depth and
    current_queue_depth are zero.

    When we register upper level drivers in scsi_register_device(), we
    call scsi_build_commandblocks (again), and get a queue depth of 1,
    since we've cleared new_queue_depth.

    (In many cases, for one device we call build command blocks twice, call
    release command blocks, and then build command blocks again. Yuck)

    Removing the scsi_release_commandblocks() in scsi_register_host()
    would also fix the problem, and in most cases, would not waste any
    space. In the worst case AFAICT it would waste one scsi_cmnd (about 300
    or so bytes?).

    I see no good reason to zero new_queue_depth in scsi_release_commandblocks,
    as new_queue_depth is the desired queue depth, and should remain so until
    scsi_adjust_queue_depth is called. Setting new_queue_depth to zero means
    we have to call slave_attach again to set it right, and depending on what
    else an adapter slave_attach does could be very wrong.

    -- Patrick Mansfield
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.030 / U:10.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site