Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:03:41 -0500 | From | Shawn <> | Subject | Re: EVMS Submission for 2.5 |
| |
On 10/03, Christoph Hellwig said something like: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:33:20PM -0500, Kevin Corry wrote: > > EVMS provides a new, stand-alone subsystem to the kernel > > i.e. it duplictes existing block layer/volume managment functionality..
Ok, LVM1 is non-existant if that's what you're referring to. Really, this replaces LVM1, but your statement WRT md still has merit. As for md duplication, it has been stated already that a preferred approach might be to send only core functionality bits for now, leaving that out till that question can be addressed.
Let's take an initially critical look, both philisophically and technically at this, but also keep an open mind. There /is/ a difference.
-- Shawn Leas core@enodev.com
My house is on the median strip of a highway. You don't really notice, except I have to leave the driveway doing 60 MPH. -- Stephen Wright - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |