lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 29 Oct 2002 08:40:25 +0100
FromJens Axboe <>
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.44-mm6 contest results
On Mon, Oct 28 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > 
> > io_load:
> > Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> > 2.5.44 [3]              873.8   9       69      12      12.24
> > 2.5.44-mm1 [3]          347.3   22      35      15      4.86
> > 2.5.44-mm2 [3]          294.2   28      19      10      4.12
> > 2.5.44-mm4 [3]          358.7   23      25      10      5.02
> > 2.5.44-mm5 [4]          270.7   29      18      11      3.79
> > 2.5.44-mm6 [3]          284.1   28      20      10      3.98
> 
> Jens, I think I prefer fifo_batch=16.  We do need to expose
> these in /somewhere so people can fiddle with them.

I was hoping someone else would do comprehensive disk benchmarks with
fifo_batch=32 and fifo_batch=16, but I guess that you have to currently
change the define in the source doesn't make that very likely. I don't
really like your global settings (for per-queue entities), but I guess
they can suffice until a better approach is done.

I'll do some benching today.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:30    [W:0.122 / U:0.150 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans