lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)
    Date
    On Monday 28 October 2002 01:46, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    > 2.5.44-mm4 Virgin
    > 2.5.44-mm4-focht-1 Focht main
    > 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-1 Hbaum main
    > 2.5.44-mm4-focht-12 Focht main + Focht balance_exec
    > 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-1 Hbaum main + Hbaum balance_exec
    > 2.5.44-mm4-f1-h2 Focht main + Hbaum balance_exec
    >
    > Schedbench 4:
    > Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
    > 2.5.44-mm4 32.45 49.47 129.86 0.82
    > 2.5.44-mm4-focht-1 38.61 45.15 154.48 1.06
    > 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-1 37.81 46.44 151.26 0.78
    > 2.5.44-mm4-focht-12 23.23 38.87 92.99 0.85
    > 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-12 22.26 34.70 89.09 0.70
    > 2.5.44-mm4-f1-h2 21.39 35.97 85.57 0.81

    One more remarks:
    You seem to have made the numa_test shorter. That reduces it to beeing
    simply a check for the initial load balancing as the hackbench running in
    the background (and aimed to disturb the initial load balancing) might
    start too late. You will most probably not see the impact of node affinity
    with such short running tests. But we weren't talking about node affinity,
    yet...

    Erich

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.021 / U:59.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site