![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi ! I remember this discussion too, and am also used to symlink mtab to /proc/mounts. But I also remember some people stating that /proc/mounts doesn't contain all information (some mount flags, nfs options ...) which may be needed for a mount -o remount, while mtab contains them. I too agree that it's non-sense to have both mtab and /proc/mounts. If mounts isn't usable, why keep it ? At the moment, the only reason why I would abandon this symlink would be that mounts be removed from /proc entirely ! And I also agree that mtab shouldn't be under /etc (this is the only file that needs to be written to). At least, it should be moved to /var/state or something like that, provided it's available early in the boot stage, but this issue is not a kernel one anyway. But at this time, I still think that a symlink to /proc/mounts is the safest solution in embedded or diskless situations, because even if we cannot update it for the very first mounts, at least it will be correct when /proc is mounted. May be we should just accept this case as a common one, and update tools (mount, umount, df, ?) to be able to use both mtab and /proc/mounts, and simply ignore any rootfs entry. Just my 0.02 euros. Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:30 [W:0.215 / U:0.780 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||