[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] linux-2.5.43_vsyscall_A0

> > Guess you'll have some problems then with UML on x86-64, which always
> > uses vgettimeofday. But it's only used for gettimeofday() currently,
> > perhaps it's not that bad when the UML child runs with the host's
> > time.
> It's not horrible, but it's still broken. There are people who depend
> on UML being able to keep its own time separately from the host.
> > I guess it would be possible to add some support for UML to map own
> > code over the vsyscall reserved locations. UML would need to use the
> > syscalls then. But it'll be likely ugly.
> Yeah, it would be.
> My preferred solution would be for libc to ask the kernel where the vsyscall
> area is. That's reasonably clean and virtualizable. Andrea doesn't like it
> because it adds a few instructions to the vsyscall address calculation.

But sandboxed application could still "guess" where vsyscall address
is and get the data it is not supposed to get, right?
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.109 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site