[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] pre-decoded wchan output

    > > Can't you just left the old, nuerical one in even if CONFIG_KALLSYMS
    > > ise set? One ifdef less and far less surprises..
    > But why? Save the call to get_wchan()...

    Yes, and force users to update procps for no good reason. And "new"
    procps will still need code to deal with get_wchan themselves... Plus
    you loose information by killing get_wchan() -- two different wait
    points in one function seems very possible to me.
    Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala
    What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.021 / U:4.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site