Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Oct 2002 01:08:57 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pre-decoded wchan output |
| |
Hi!
> > Can't you just left the old, nuerical one in even if CONFIG_KALLSYMS > > ise set? One ifdef less and far less surprises.. > > But why? Save the call to get_wchan()...
Yes, and force users to update procps for no good reason. And "new" procps will still need code to deal with get_wchan themselves... Plus you loose information by killing get_wchan() -- two different wait points in one function seems very possible to me. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |