[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pre-decoded wchan output

> > Can't you just left the old, nuerical one in even if CONFIG_KALLSYMS
> > ise set? One ifdef less and far less surprises..
> But why? Save the call to get_wchan()...

Yes, and force users to update procps for no good reason. And "new"
procps will still need code to deal with get_wchan themselves... Plus
you loose information by killing get_wchan() -- two different wait
points in one function seems very possible to me.
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.025 / U:41.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site