lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch
From
Date
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 18:23, mingming cao wrote:
> Thanks for your quick feedback. I did LTP tests on it--it passed(well,
> I saw a failure on shmctl(), but the failure was there since 2.5.43
> kernel). I will do more stress tests on it soon.
Which shmctl() test is this? To my knowledge, there are no current
known issues with shmctl tests. There is however one with sem02 in
semctl() that last I heard has been partially fixed in the kernel and
still needs to be fixed in glibc. Is that the one you are referring to,
or is there really some other shmctl test in LTP that is failing?

Thanks,
Paul Larson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.139 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site