[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Csum and csum copyroutines benchmark
    On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:59, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
    > Well, that makes it run entirely in L0 cache. This is unrealistic
    > for actual use. movntq is x3 faster when you hit RAM instead of L0.
    > You need to be more clever than that - generate pseudo-random
    > offsets in large buffer and run on ~1K pieces of that buffer.

    In a lot of cases its extremely realistic to assume the network buffers
    are in cache. The copy/csum path is often touching just generated data,
    or data we just accessed via read(). The csum RX path from a card with
    DMA is probably somewhat different.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.018 / U:5.724 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site