Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:50:28 +0400 | | From | Andrey Panin <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only) |
| |
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:49:19PM +0900, Osamu Tomita wrote: > This is a part of big patchset for support PC-9800 architecture, one of i386 > sub architectures. > Core part cleanup has done. (But device drivers are still working.) > Many "#if" are killed by using "mach-xxx" framework. > If someone pick up this, we are very happy. > Comments are always welcome. Please tell me.
Ok, you asked for it :))
> if (boot_cpu_data.hard_math && !cpu_has_fpu) > - setup_irq(13, &irq13); > +#ifndef CONFIG_PC9800 > + setup_irq(13, &fpu_irq); > +#else > + setup_irq(8, &fpu_irq); > +#endif > }
May be this should be done this way (with FPU_IRQ_NUMBER hidden in the arch specific header):
- setup_irq(13, &irq13); + setup_irq(FPU_IRQ_NUMBER, &fpu_irq);
> diff -urN linux/arch/i386/kernel/pc9800_debug.c linux98/arch/i386/kernel/pc9800_debug.c
Why this file is not in mach-pc9800 directory ?
And what is IORESOURCE98_SPARSE flag in mach-pc9800/mach_resources.h file ?
-- Andrey Panin | Embedded systems software developer pazke@orbita1.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |