[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer?
    On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 14:01, Slavcho Nikolov wrote:
    > Non GPL modules that want to attach themselves between all L2 drivers and
    > upper layers would not have to incur a performance loss if netif_rx() is
    > made a

    What you are suggesting can only result in illegal binary-only

    If you override netif_rx(), you are by definition implementing a derived
    work of the kernel reimplementing core functionality, thus your binary
    only driver is not abiding by the GPL and you are on very shaky legal

    It isn't exported for a reason, there is legitimate use of it from

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.045 / U:33.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site