lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 22 Oct 2002 16:28:13 -0600
FromAllen Campbell <>
SubjectRe: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:32:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> 
> So what's your own particular problem with BK again if you don't have to use
> it?

I didn't mention that I had a problem with it.  I do have some
questions.

If I one day had the idea of building a filesystem where version
control is inherent, could this be done with BK?  Further, I
understand the design of EXT3 uses a form of multiversion concurrency
to ensure metadata integrity.  Does this constitute "substantially
similar capabilities?"  That's pretty damn vague.

> I hope you still have the hability to write and contribute GPL'ed code.

-- 
  Allen Campbell       |  Lurking at the bottom of the
  allenc@verinet.com   |   gravity well, getting old.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:30    [W:2.641 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans