Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:22:23 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec |
| |
It is all bolted togather and does not need to be piece from random parts. Thus in simple reality, it is superior.
Maybe FreeS/WAN will get busy and compete or die.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Sandy Harris wrote:
> Mitsuru KANDA wrote: > > >Hello Linux kernel network maintainers, > > > >I'm a member of USAGI project. > > > >In IPv6 specifications, IPsec is mandatory. > > > >We implemented IPsec for Linux IP stack. > > > >At present, our implementation includes: > > PF_KEY V2 interface, > > Security Association Database and > > Security Policy Database for whole IP versions, > > IPsec for IPv6,(transport, tunnel mode), > > IPsec for IPv4 (transport mode), > > > >Would you mind checking it ? > > > Is this code being checked in to the mainline kernel? Or becoming part > of the > CryptoAPI patch set? Bravo, in either case. > > How does that affect FreeS/WAN development? > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |