[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)

    On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Andreas Dilger wrote:

    > On Oct 02, 2002 23:46 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > Absolutely - taking the core EVMS(say the core code and the bits to do
    > > LVM1) and polishing them up to be good clean citizens without code
    > > duplication and other weirdness would be a superb start for EVMS as a
    > > merge candidate. The rest can follow a piece at a time once the core is
    > > right if EVMS is the right path
    > I actually see EVMS as the "VFS for disk devices". It is a very good
    > way to at allow dynamic disk device allocation, and could relatively
    > easily be modified to use all of the "legacy" disk major devices and
    > export only real partitions (one per minor).
    > You could have thousands of disks and partitions without the current
    > limitations on major/minor device mapping.
    > This was one of the things that Linus was pushing for when 2.5 started.

    ... and you don't need EVMS for that.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.019 / U:24.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site