[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] linux-2.5.43_vsyscall_A0
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 03:50:37AM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > My preferred solution would be for libc to ask the kernel where the
> > vsyscall area is. That's reasonably clean and virtualizable. Andrea
> > doesn't like it because it adds a few instructions to the vsyscall
> > address calculation.
> Sounds like the best solution indeed, especially when keeping
> in mind the strange people who want to run with a different
> user:kernel split or statically linked binaries at fun addresses
> so they've got more space for their fortran arrays ;)

x86-64 addresses that (not that it would need it) by putting vsyscalls at
the top of the virtual mapping after the direct mapped area. This part
never moves even with changed __PAGE_OFFSET. The same technique should work
on i386 too.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.230 / U:1.816 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site