Messages in this thread | | | From | Mark Gross <> | Subject | Re: [patch] thread-aware coredumps, 2.5.43-C3 | Date | Sat, 19 Oct 2002 11:42:51 -0700 |
| |
On Saturday 19 October 2002 06:20 am, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Therefore, I don't think we should "contaminate" our source with > backwards compatibility hacks.
I agree, lets get the kernel and gdb to match up as soon as possible.
When do you think GDB get these 2 changes (section ID for extended floating point sections and that namesz == 5 test) in?
< snip >
> > In the light of the discussion above, I don't think Ingo's patch > should change NT_FPXREG/NT_PRFPXREG from 20 to 0x46e62b7f (and the > name shouldn't be changed either I think). We should change it in > GDB/BFD instead from 0x46e62b7f. The value 20 is already publically > available in the current kernel headers and glibc headers. What are > your feelings about that, Ingo?
--mgross
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |