lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch] thread-aware coredumps, 2.5.43-C3
Date
On Saturday 19 October 2002 06:20 am, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Therefore, I don't think we should "contaminate" our source with
> backwards compatibility hacks.

I agree, lets get the kernel and gdb to match up as soon as possible.

When do you think GDB get these 2 changes (section ID for extended floating
point sections and that namesz == 5 test) in?

< snip >

>
> In the light of the discussion above, I don't think Ingo's patch
> should change NT_FPXREG/NT_PRFPXREG from 20 to 0x46e62b7f (and the
> name shouldn't be changed either I think). We should change it in
> GDB/BFD instead from 0x46e62b7f. The value 20 is already publically
> available in the current kernel headers and glibc headers. What are
> your feelings about that, Ingo?

--mgross

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:1.485 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site