lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove sys_security
    * Stephen Smalley (sds@tislabs.com) wrote:
    >
    > On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    >
    > > It adds infrastructure to implement syscalls without peer review.
    > > And then it ends being crap like the selinux syscalls.
    >
    > Yes, I think you've made your point. Go ahead, remove sys_security.

    Looks like we should remove this. The interface is awkward, and there
    are many examples of how it's not needed and is broken by design. I know
    SubDomain can get by without it.

    thanks,
    -chris
    --
    Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.036 / U:34.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site