Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:36:50 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security |
| |
* Stephen Smalley (sds@tislabs.com) wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > It adds infrastructure to implement syscalls without peer review. > > And then it ends being crap like the selinux syscalls. > > Yes, I think you've made your point. Go ahead, remove sys_security.
Looks like we should remove this. The interface is awkward, and there are many examples of how it's not needed and is broken by design. I know SubDomain can get by without it.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |