[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove sys_security
* Stephen Smalley ( wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > It adds infrastructure to implement syscalls without peer review.
> > And then it ends being crap like the selinux syscalls.
> Yes, I think you've made your point. Go ahead, remove sys_security.

Looks like we should remove this. The interface is awkward, and there
are many examples of how it's not needed and is broken by design. I know
SubDomain can get by without it.

Linux Security Modules
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.087 / U:7.688 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site