[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove sys_security
    * Stephen Smalley ( wrote:
    > On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > > It adds infrastructure to implement syscalls without peer review.
    > > And then it ends being crap like the selinux syscalls.
    > Yes, I think you've made your point. Go ahead, remove sys_security.

    Looks like we should remove this. The interface is awkward, and there
    are many examples of how it's not needed and is broken by design. I know
    SubDomain can get by without it.

    Linux Security Modules
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.019 / U:27.456 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site