Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:09:25 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: balance_dirty_pages broken |
| |
Doug Ledford wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:54:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Doug Ledford wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:22:46AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > > Sure, coming under separate cover. > > > > > > Actually, this isn't needed now I assume ;-) > > > > Well I was rather interested in seeing it to find out why your > > compile is busted. You seem to be very protective of the compiler > > error messages ;) > > OK. .config attached, error message inline: > > gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/i386/kernel/.mpparse.o.d -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 > -march=i686 -Iarch/i386/mach-generic -nostdinc -iwithprefix include > -DKBUILD_BASENAME=mpparse -c -o arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.o > arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c > arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c: In function `MP_processor_info': > arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c:130: warning: implicit declaration of function > `Dprintk'
but, but, but. The patch I sent should have fixed that. It makes Dprintk visible in apic.h regardless of the setting of CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> ... > > Should I run another test of just this patch to be sure?
She'll be right, mate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |