![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
I am eager to be able to sandbox my processes on a system without the help of suid-root programs (as I prefer to have none of these on my system). Would it be reasonable to allow non-root processes to chroot(), if the chroot syscall also changed the cwd for non-root processes? Is there a reason besides standards compliance that chroot() does not already change directory to the chroot'd directory for root processes? Would it actually break existing apps if it did change the directory? -Eric (who wishes there were better ways to run untrusted code) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:30 [W:1.492 / U:0.050 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||