Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Patch: linux-2.5.42/kernel/sys.c - warm reboot should not suspend devices | From | Eric Blade <> | Date | 15 Oct 2002 00:55:52 -0400 |
| |
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:05, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > For myself I am happy that someone introduced > device_shutdown and it has reasonable semantics. > > As for halting the system, we currently have two cases: > > > case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_HALT: > notifier_call_chain(&reboot_notifier_list, SYS_HALT, NULL); > system_running = 0; > device_shutdown(); > printk(KERN_EMERG "System halted.\n"); > machine_halt(); > do_exit(0); > break; > > case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF: > notifier_call_chain(&reboot_notifier_list, SYS_POWER_OFF, NULL); > system_running = 0; > device_shutdown(); > printk(KERN_EMERG "Power down.\n"); > machine_power_off(); > do_exit(0); > break; >
i see four occurences in my 2.5.42: LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART, LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_HALT, LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF, and LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2
> > But for the most part my impression is that we need to get devices > drivers behaving properly in the 2.5.x And that the basic model > is o.k. It just needs some pounding on the rough spots.
I agree on this point :)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |