Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:00:29 -0700 | From | Mike Anderson <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.5.42-1 |
| |
Oleg Drokin [green@namesys.com] wrote: > Hello! > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:52:17AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > > For some reason I now need this patch to make bk-current to compile > > That patch is against stock 2.5.42, so I don't make any guarantees about > > bk-current.
I was seeing the same failure on 2.5.42.
> > I am in no way inplying that you are making any guarantees about your patches to > work with something but the kernels they are released for. > On the other hand I thought you might find it useful if I report to you > problems with more modern kernels that I encounter so that when you will > update UML to never kernel you do not need to hit all the problems by yourself. > > > However the __i386__ thing should be taken care of by Makefile-i386 doing > > CFLAGS += -U__i386__ > > I might have messed up the patch, I'll check and fix it if so. > > Yes, it seems to be the case. > > CFLAGS is defined first in arch/um/Makefile and only then you do > include Makefile-{SUBARCH} > > Moving 'include $(ARCH_DIR)/Makefile-$(SUBARCH)' in front of CFLAGS > helped.
This fixed the __i386__ issue, but messed up the header symlinks. I moved CFLAGS after the includes and this appears to have fixed both problems, but makefile magic is not my thing so YMMV.
-andmike -- Michael Anderson andmike@us.ibm.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |