![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> Bah! I'm at a competitive disadvantage because I've got a lesser > BITS_PER_LONG. No matter, NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG shall be conquered > and the explosion of kernel threads will be quite visible (though > unfortunately probably post-freeze). Speaking of which, the recent CONFIG_NR_CPUS addition shows just how bloated all our [NR_CPU] structures are. We need to get serious about using the per cpu data stuff. Going from 32 to 64 was over 500kB on my ppc64 build. Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||