[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
    Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    >>+#define for_each_valid_zone(zone, zonelist) \
    >>+ for (zone = *zonelist->zones; zone; zone++) \
    >>+ if (current->memblk_binding.bitmask & (1 << zone->zone_pgdat->memblk_id))
    > Does the compiler optimise the last bit away on non-NUMA?

    > Want to wrap it in #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_MEMBIND or something?
    Not a problem... I've got some free time this afternoon... Should only
    take me a few hours to retool the patch to include this change. ;)

    > Not sure what the speed impact of this would be, but I'd
    > rather it was optional, even on NUMA boxen.
    Sounds reasonable... It'll be in the next itteration.

    > Other than that, looks pretty good.
    Glad to hear!

    > M.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.026 / U:66.584 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site