Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:51:13 +0100 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] klibc 0.1 release |
| |
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> I understand that's OK for diet hotplug, so it's OK to take just enough > code to make your project work. The important question probably is > whether diet hotplug will be part of the kernel distribution or not. > If not, I don't think it makes much sense to not just reference the diet > libc. Maybe we can put the diet libc distribution on ftp.kernel.org to > show the affinity better (and make it more widely mirrored). > > But forking means you will have to watch our CVS and port stuff from > here to there every now and then.
More importantly, the dietlibc compilation units are tiny, so even linking against dietlibc itself is probably not much different in outcome than a spinoff.
-- Matthias Andree
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |